May 16, 2004

Arco Arena Location

Category: Urban Planning

arcoarena.jpg

Sacramento: It has taken a long time for cities to re-discover the benefits of downtown stadiums - good for businesses, less investment in infrastructure, reintroduces the populace to public transportation and urban life, etc... etc... and now, at least in Basketball, the majority of arenas are located in central cities.

Despite being built in 1988, The Arco Arena outside Sacramento represents the absolute worst case scenerio in stadium construction, being built literally on farmland at the urban fringe. The Kings may be a hot team, but many of the benefits of having a hot NBA team are therefore lost in the corn. I'm rooting for Minnesota.

Posted by Nick at May 16, 2004 06:44 PM | TrackBack

Comments:

Not a big fan of downtown stadiums. We have three.. Seattle Center for the Sonics, Safeco field for the Mariners and now SeaHawk stadium. I'm not really into sports and the traffic snarls around these stadiums are beyond horrendous. Couple that with games that start around rush hour and you have an exercise in monumental stupidity. Move these fugly things out of my city!

Posted by: dunsany on May 18, 2004 01:55 PM

Arco Arena is not really even on the fringe of the city anymore. Given the way that suburban sprawl has spread, its almost "downtown" now.

Posted by: bkmiller on May 18, 2004 04:26 PM

Is Arco Arena also built in a swamp, the way they did with the Meadowlands in Jersey?

Posted by: Greg on May 18, 2004 06:32 PM
Post a comment